My CMS

Tag: html allowed

  • SEO Factor Blog

    November 2, 2006 To continue with my recent rants on alt tags, their importance, and proper use, I wanted to further my stance on this subject with Google backing me.

    Google has been, and continues to work on “Google Accessible,” a Google search engine built specifically for the seeing impaired. It will rely a lot on the same ranking procedures as Google, with the exception of the heavy weight given to sites that are easily conveyed to the vision impaired. This can include making the pages easy to read, preventing visual clutter, and yes, proper use of the alt tags.

    On a personal note, this is a great thing for our online community. I really like seeing Google push further for the better of the Internet by accommodating the needs of not only the mass population, but those with disabilities as well.

    Professionally, this, with the impending suit against Target, will only help to validate my argument that this is a subject to be taken, and dealt with seriously.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/48/

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    November 3, 2006 I can’t express how many times the ‘SEO / Flash’ subject has come up. It’s a very valid issue, and carries a lot of debate. The problem with Flash is the inability for the SE’s to read the text in the movie or animation. Well, there is a way to make this better.

    Here is an article on the whole subject at SEO Consultants that explains the process in detail, but basically you are recreating the Flash subject matter in a readable HTML form with the help of JavaScript. The first couple of ideas for this is really for the words in the Flash document for navigation or the page content for a bit.

    I was thinking that it would likely be best for those all-Flash sites out there, to completely recreate the whole site in this fashion, with look and feel and all. This method would require a bit of work, but the benefits would be well worth it. SE’s aside, if a visitor gets to your site and can not see the Flash for whatever reason, even small accommodation may not be good enough. It would be nice for them to have the pleasure of a full fledged website to view and take advantage of.

    So check the link out. SEO Factor will be working a few sites in the near future with this method implemented. We will let you know how it goes.

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/49/

    Leave a Comment

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    November 22, 2006 In light of the coming holiday, I thought it would be fun to show some of the similarities between SEO and cooking a turkey. 1. You usually wait until it’s crunch time to get started, then run around frantically getting all your priorities and methods in place. 2. You spend more time online reading about what to do than actually implementing. 3. There is an hour-long debate about whether you should be stuffing it or not. 4. You put in an immense amount of work, then have to sit and wait for…..evverrrrr. 5. Because you are too impatient, you end up hurting your progress because every ten minutes you are in there poking around instead of letting it do what has to be done. 6. There are usually too many people involved, and kind words are not usually the result. Well, that’s about all I can come up with right now. It’s gonna be another light week again ( I know I said that last week, but it’s getting busier. I promise more.) I wish everyone a safe and happy Thanksgiving. In tradition of this particular holiday, I want to share my thanks to all my friends and loved ones that help SEO Factor along. Together we are creating something that can prove bring a lot of happiness to us. There is no way I would be able to do any of it alone. So thank you all.

    Later guys (and girls).

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/57/

    Leave a Comment

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    February 6, 2007 Ok, so we all know how important IBL’s are for ranking in Google. I’ve gone over the importance and what factors are taken into account, but one of the most frustrating thing was the idea that you never really had an idea at how many links you were getting credit for from Google. The ‘link:site’ operator was never all inclusive because of the metric’s weight in determining your ranking. Well….Google will now let you, and only you, see this information. So long as you can prove you own the site with Google’s ‘Webmaster Tools.’

    More here.

    This is incredible news. This should help us all understand a bit more on how Google determines where you stand. But also keep in mind that this is new, and as such, will not be void of inconsistencies or errors. But again, and excellent step forward in understanding how the Big G works.

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/59/

    Leave a Comment

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    October 9, 2006 A lot of times people ask me where I get my information or where they should start reading to learn more about SEO. I usually reply with a half cocky/half joking “read my blog, it has all you need to know.”

    Obviously this is not the truth, as no one person can know all there is to know about Search Engine Optimization (SEO). And even if there were, that person would not likely also know everything there is to know about Search Engine Marketing (SEM). So, giving credit to Rand Fishkin at SEOmoz, the following link is to his list of the blogs he reads. Mine is not quite as extensive due to particular tastes and such, but this is a great way to go through a lot of the bigger names, and make a list of your own.

    Ranking 50 Top Blogs in the Search Space

    WebproWorld also has a great post by incredible help on ‘SEO, Where Do I Begin?’

    I do want to point something out about resources though. I can honestly and humbly say that the list and most of the mods at WebproWorld know more of SEO, have more experience, and could likely out rank me any day. But in this field, learning what it is, and knowing what it is are 2 different things. I could claim all day long that the information I give is correct, that I have ranked many sites well, and have a 100% success rate (I really don’t). But in this whole blog have I ever once mentioned a single URL in my hands? Nope, not once. So why believe me? Those I work with and reading this do because they have seen it. But if you are visiting from outside of our little circle, you shouldn’t. I try very hard to make sure I am conveying information correctly, but it is always best to try these things out yourself before holding it as gospel. There is a saying in physics (yes Billy, it’s a saying in mathematics too…jerk) that until something has been measured, and assigned a number, it does not exist. Or something like that, it’s been a while since I was in school. All I’m saying is that all the book knowledge that can possibly be attained, is no match for real-world experience. So just because someone tells you it’s true, doesn’t mean it is until you have tried it yourself.

    I hope these resources help. There is a plethora of great information out there. You just have to reach out and grab it.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/36/

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    October 18, 2006 The following is a link to a post at SEOMoz. Rand started to compile information for on-page optimization efforts, and provided all of us with this invaluable information.

    Rand’s List of Search Engine Ranking Factors

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/42/

    Leave a Comment

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    October 9, 2006 In my position as a consultant on SEO, I seem to be getting an increase in the amount of customers asking why their designer had not considered the changes I suggest. Some of these questions are usually followed by “that jerk. I’ve been dealing with his crap for too long.” So are there really that many bad designers out there? I say no. Here’s why… SEO is a very analytical and tedious process, and in most cases deals solely with black and white. Most SEO specialist care not for the aesthetics of a site, giving only worry to how well it is written and how it functions on a search engine. I seem to have grown into this position because of it’s appeal to the nerd in me. I was great at math growing up, and I became a programmer in low level compile languages at an early age. My brain seems to like things that can be measured and assigned a number. I can give you all sorts of neat little formulas on finding the weight and height of a dog. But please don’t ask me to draw one. One of my best friends and co-workers is a website designer. He can do some really neat things with animation and design programs, and implement them into a site making some of the nicest pages I get to see online. He grew up in a very artistic environment, learning to play multiple musical instruments at an early age, and becoming a painter later in his life. He could create on canvas the most beautiful landscape, but when we argue on politics and I give him the middle finger as I walk away, I can almost see him trying to count. So what does this mean? Who is a better person to employ with your website? Should you fire the designer that didn’t do a good job on getting your site seen? My answer is this. If you are number 1 on Google under a specified search term, but your site looks like a 3 year old drew it with a crayon and scanned it into the computer, how well do you think your sales will be? And if have you the best looking site on the Internet, but nobody even sees it, what then? You need to have a touch of both. There are designers out there that do have a mind for SEO, and vice versa for SEO Specialists, but in order to get the best out of your online investment, you will really need to implement the workings of both. In a perfect world, you cold get both in the same step, and some companies offer this, but can get a little costly. Usually you already have a site and need someone to optimize it, working with your current designer. The nice thing about our industry (that of creating an online presence) is that there is usually a mutual respect, and to work with a designer is usually not a difficult task. There are some that feel threatened one a client introduces someone into an already established relationship, but that usually fades once it is made clear on what you are hired to do.

    So to all you out there that have a site designed, and a designer on call, and call me wanting to know why your site is not doing well in respect to traffic and should you fire your designer, realize what you hired that designer for in the first place.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/23/

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    October 7, 2006 I recently read forum post on the three signs of a nightmare client, and was thinking, “wow, I get a lot of problems from customers wanting too much for too little.” I thought it would be a good idea to talk about time and return.

    It starts with the submission. Google is known to have the longer time period of the three big boys. I haven’t really had a problem with them, and usually get my sites indexed in about a week or 2. Every once in a while it takes about 4 or 5 weeks, but that also has a lot to do with a lack of a full site. (that’s a killer by the way. I learned the hard way. Don’t start submitting and marketing a half-built site). DMOZ should be your main submission goal. Being human-edited though, it can take some serious time to be indexed. Sometimes as long as 18 months. Yeah, no shit. But it is also used by a number of search engines as a means of including a site.

    So now you are in Google and have submitted to DMOZ, why is your site not on page one? Because there are almost 50 million other sites out there in the same category. I used to often get a customer’s pissed off call because I have been working on their site for about 2 weeks and they are not number 1 on Google when searching for “car.” Yeah….that’s odd. I say “used” because I have learned a few lessons in my young life, and am now secure enough to turn a potential customer away. With so many sites out there, you have to prove yourself. You have to prove that your site is relevant and important and should be ranked well. We have been talking about this and will continue to do so in detail, but this article is on time, not optimization details. Anyway, you have to have an optimized site (which takes time), and you have to get link popularity (which takes even more time when done legitimately). Also, a new site has to compete with sites that have been in the search engines for a great amount of time. It’s not always the determining factor, but tenure can have an effect on a site’s ranking. It’s the Internet. It takes time. Do yourself a favor and let your future customer know what to expect up front. I usually tell my customer’s that the design and initial optimization of a site shouldn’t be longer than 2 or three months. (keep in mind this is an average on a fairly simple site). At which point I continue with SEO maintenance and link building. We also do some neat things with press releases and other marketing tactics that are really opening some doors for us and in turn our customers. I advise that you should see some form of substantial result at 6 months. At 10 – 12 months, the customer’s expectations should have been met. Some of you don’t have customer’s as much as you consult for a larger company. This consultation involves just that, consulting, and the lack of actual implementation yourself. Advise your customer, after a change has been made, for better or worse, there should be some change at about 3 – 4 weeks. This is often plenty of time for a re crawl and redetermination of ranking. Obviously, there are exceptions to every rule, and again, this is a loose timeline. I try to stick to this standard to keep me safe though. If things are great early, you have a happy customer and you are done. If things are half way done 3 months too late, you have a mad customer that will tell everyone they contact, and you are still stressing the work on a site. Not a good situation.

    Well, I hope this helps with the time issue.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/8/

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    October 9, 2006 In creating a website we try to desperately to make something aesthetically pleasing, and there are so many methods to that madness. But the prettier the page, often means the more code we have to implement. More code equals less SEO friendly. Some things, in fact, will create a page that is not “crawler friendly,” and thus create problems when trying to get a site indexed or ranked. You want the crawlers (robots, spiders, se’s, whatever) to have as easy a time as possible. So let’s touch on a few things that will make a world of difference.

    Robots tag vs. Robots.txt file

    The robots.txt file is used in regard to directing a search engine. Not so much on where to go, as where not to go. You can use it to tell a search engine not to index a certain page or pages, or not to follow certain links. This is usually the case where there is confidential information you wouldn’t want a search engine to index, but can sometimes inadvertently cause a page to not be crawled at all. You will want to be careful in your robots.txt creation to avoid preventing a crawler on your site. This has, many times, been the cause for a site not being indexed. The same holds true for the robots tag. The robots tag is a little less customizable, and is rarely needed because most people put it on “index, follow” which is the default anyway.

    JavaScript

    A lot of cool functions and graphics can be achieved with the use of JavaScript. The problem is that sometimes the use requires a lot of code to be placed in the HEAD of the site. Though the code is ignored by the search engines, they still have to drudge through all of it to get to the readable code. Some search engines have a timeout or a maximum character read before they will just leave and move to the next site. It’s best to call the JavaScript from an outside file if at all possible. Also, be mindful that an error in JavaScript can cause a crawler to stop completely, again, moving to the next site. So, just be mindful of the extra stuff you put on your site. Try to keep the code clean and prevent a possible problem. Just remember that the crawler for a search engines has a great deal of work to do. It has to be fast, efficient, and simple. This simplicity means that it’s not going to work too hard to get what it needs before it gives up.

    Thank you, Mr. Roboto. (I really couldn’t resist)

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/16/

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed:

  • SEO Factor Blog

    October 7, 2006 One of the terms used a great deal in the SEO industry is “PageRank.” PageRank is basically Google’s way of telling how “important” a page is. It is often thought that a good PageRank will inherently mean a good ranking. This is not so…sorta.

    Google’s PageRank is determined primarily on quality inbound links, sometimes called “Link Popularity.” There is a neat little explanation of the algorithm used to determine PageRank here for all you math enthusiasts out there. It’s a good read, but gets deep. One thing on this. For your PR to increase, the site linking to you will need to have a good ranking and be a relevant website.

    Now, PR does not mean that you will rank higher in Google, it just means that you have the proper criteria for inbound links, which means you will rank higher in Google. Funny huh? There is a lot of debate on whether you should consider a website’s PR before exchanging links with them. Nobody can give an exact answer for sure, because nobody knows. I can tell you that considering the algorithm, and logic, the theory is sound to me.

    I do indeed use the PR as a way of seeing if my SEO methods are working. Not the first way, and not the most important, but a way. You can check your, and other site’s PR with Google’s Toolbar.

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.seo-factor.com/Blog/bblog/trackback.php/13/

    Leave a Comment

    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, HTML allowed: